Directors' duties on the insolvency of a BVI company

At all times, directors of a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands (the “BVI”) need to be aware of their role and responsibilities as director, in particular where the company is insolvent or of doubtful solvency. 

This client guide provides an overview of the duties of a director of a company and the types of claims that a director of a company can face under the BVI Business Companies Act, 2004 (“BCA”) and the BVI Insolvency Act, 2003 (the “IA”) in particular:

• the roles and responsibilities of directors of a company, both generally and when a company is in the zone of insolvency;
• the personal liabilities that a director may face where a company enters into an insolvency process; and
• the steps a reasonably prudent director can be expected to consider and, if appropriate, take when a company is in the zone of insolvency. 

Directors’ duties under the BCA

A director of a company owes duties to the company as a whole and the shareholders whilst the company is solvent. The general duties of a director of a company are contained in its constitutional documents, statute, and principles of equity and the common law. These duties apply to both de jure directors (i.e. those directors listed on the register of directors) and to de facto directors (i.e. persons who act as director, even though they do not have the title of director). 

We have set out, in the table below, a summary of directors’ duties as a matter of BVI law under the BCA. 

Change in directors’ duty from shareholders to creditors

The so-called ‘creditor duty’ imposes a duty on the directors to give weight to the interests of creditors when they consider what is in the interests of the company as a whole. That duty is engaged not only when the company is insolvent, but also when the company is bordering on insolvency or when a proposed course of action will put the company in such a position. However, the duty only arises if the company’s insolvency is likely, and only becomes paramount once the company is actually insolvent. Prior to insolvency, when the company is in the ‘zone of insolvency’, creditors’ interests must be considered alongside those of the company and shareholders.

The assessment of when directors must consider creditors’ interests, and to what extent, is not straightforward. Legal advice should be sought by any director with concerns about a company’s financial viability, to mitigate the risk of liability arising for breach of duty.

Insolvency Act claims

If a company does enter insolvent liquidation, either via the appointment of liquidators to the company by a members’ qualifying resolution or via a court application by a creditor, then upon the appointment of the liquidators, the control of the company is handed over to the liquidator and the directors cease to have the power to manage the business and affairs of the company. For further information on the appointment of liquidators to an insolvent company, please refer to our client guide.

The liquidators have statutory powers of investigation and will require the directors to complete a statement of affairs and call for documentation to be provided by the directors and others (which may include any legal advice provided to the company). The liquidators can also, if necessary, conduct examinations of directors and officers.

The IA provides for a number of claims that a liquidator can bring, either in his own name or on behalf of a company, in order to recover assets to make up a shortfall in a company’s assets to pay creditor claims. These claims can be split into two categories: (i) malpractice claims, for breaches of duties owed to the company by directors or where the company’s business has been carried on improperly, and (ii) voidable transaction claims, where a company has entered into transactions that are voidable under the IA. The latter claims are usually brought against third parties who have benefited from the relevant transactions and not against the directors personally, but the court has broad powers to make orders against a range of different parties. For the purpose of this guide, we have summarised the key principles applicable to malpractice claims below.

Malpractice claims

Sections 254 to 258 of the IA deal with so-called malpractice claims. These are the principal ways in which a director may be ordered by a court to contribute assets to an insolvent company, and they include liability for misfeasance (i.e. a breach of director duties), fraudulent trading and insolvent trading. These applications can only be brought by a liquidator.

• Misfeasance: The IA misfeasance remedy provides a summary procedure to make persons, including directors, liable to compensate the company for misfeasance, breach of fiduciary duties or other duties to the company. To hold a director liable under this section it must be shown that the director was guilty of misfeasance or in breach of a fiduciary duty or other duty in relation to the company, and/or that the director has misapplied or retained or become accountable for any money or other assets of the company. This is essentially a “catch-all” provision which enables a liquidator to pursue directors in respect of their breaches of duty, including their breach of duties under the BCA (see table below) or to creditors when the company was insolvent or on the verge of insolvency.
• Fraudulent trading: The court can also make an order against a company’s directors if it is satisfied that, at any time before the commencement of the liquidation of the company, any of its business has been carried on by those directors ‘with the intent to defraud creditors of the company or creditors of any other person; or for any fraudulent purpose’. In such cases, the court can declare that a director is liable to make a contribution that the court considers proper towards the company’s assets. This is not limited to directors and officers, but applies to anyone who has been knowingly involved in carrying on the company’s business. There are no statutory defences to fraudulent trading, but it is necessary to prove dishonesty (i.e. bad faith). As a result, there is a relatively high bar in relation to such claims as compared with the insolvent trading remedy.
• Insolvent trading: A director of a company can be liable for insolvent trading where the director knew or ought to have known that there was no chance that the company would avoid going into insolvent liquidation but failed to take steps to minimise losses to the company’s creditors. The director can become liable for any further losses sustained by the company after the point where they knew or ought to have concluded that there was no reasonable prospect of the company avoiding going into insolvent liquidation, unless they took every step reasonably open to them to minimise the potential loss to a company’s creditors. 

If a Court does find that a director is liable for misfeasance, fraudulent trading or insolvent trading, it has a wide discretion as to the amount in which the director should contribute to the assets of the company.

Seek advice

Any director who is concerned that their company is in the zone of insolvency should seek specialist advice from a BVI insolvency and restructuring lawyer and/or a BVI insolvency practitioner. Please feel free to contact a member of our Carey Olsen restructuring and insolvency team should you require advice.

¹ For companies incorporated under the BCA, a company satisfies the solvency test if (i) the value of the company’s assets exceeds it liabilities; and (ii) the company is able to pay its debts as they fall due